The key witness in the Durham case provides a detailed testimony of the 2016 meeting

WASHINGTON – A former FBI agent testified on Thursday when he met with Michael Schussman, a lawyer involved in Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2016, that Mr. Sussman said he came to the FBI himself.

This testimony reinforces the case brought by the Special Advocate, John H. DurhamMr. Against Sussman, he falsely accused the FBI of bringing his suspicions to light. Possible secret communication channel Between the Trump organization and Alpha Bank, a Russian financial institution with ties to the Kremlin.

In a meeting with the FBI, Mr. Sussman, Donald J.. In a way that does not seem to be coming for partisan reasons on behalf of Trump’s political opponent, Mr. The lawsuit alleges that Sussmann tried to cover up his relationship with Ms Clinton.

Although the Sussmann case was charged with a short misrepresentation, Mr. Durham’s recordings, the Clinton campaign, sought to persuade the FBI to investigate his relationship with Russia and to persuade reporters to write stories about the matter.

Former FBI agent James A. Snyder, who was the agency’s general adviser in 2016; Mr. Baker said he did not represent anyone other than himself during the meeting. Sussman was stubborn as he told her. “I have 100 percent confidence that he said that,” he said. Baker said. “Michael is my friend and colleague. I believed it. I believed that statement was true.”

Mr. Baker’s testimony is not surprising. The night before that Mr. Susmann related to the text message sent to him, and underlined that the case could change the meaning of being somewhere on a client’s “behalf”.

See also  Tucker Carlson calls Ron Rivera a "fascist idiot" for fining Jack del Rio on January 6

Mr. When Susman’s lawyers tried to write to reporters about the Alpha Bank affair, they admitted that he had worked for the campaign. But when he thought a news article on the subject would be published, he brought the matter to the attention of the FBI individually.

Still, on Thursday, Mr. Baker also sought to raise the question of whether their client remembered exactly what they had said at the six-year meeting and the events that followed.

Mr. One of Sussman’s lawyers, Sean Bergowitz, Mr. Mr. Susman Clinton has been working closely with the campaign. Baker asked questions that indicated what he needed to know.

At the stand, Mr. Baker provided a detailed account of their encounter and the steps he took to share the matter with top FBI officials who could quickly investigate concerns raised by cyber data and cyber security research. The FBI will then conclude that concerns about Alpha Bank are unfounded.

On behalf of a client Mr. If he had thought that Sussman had approached him, he would have “made a different assessment”, especially if that client was Mr. If Trump’s political opponent, Mr. Baker said.

About the “credibility of the source” Mr. Baker added, “This would have raised some very serious questions.

Sasman trial, this Started this weekA special adviser appointed by Attorney General William P. Barr during the Trump administration, Mr. Durham, Mr. The first case to investigate is the origin of the FBI’s investigation into relations between Trump and Russia. .

Believing that the bureau has little time to operate, Mr. Baker told FBI officials about the evidence, and that Mr. He encouraged them to take it seriously because it originated from Sussman.

See also  I-80 closes in Sierra, snow hits low altitude

Mr. Baker said the FBI spoke to two New York Times reporters, one of whom was working on an article about a potential communications channel, and said the bureau needed time to begin an investigation before an article could be published.

In that light, Mr. Baker said he had also reconsidered his contacts with the media. He said the FBI was “aware and cautious” of the fact that the existence of an FBI investigation could be used by reporters as a way to report “defective or incomplete” matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.