Ballon, who The investigation was conducted last week On Daylight saving time, And he shares the Senate’s goal of ending the “spring forward” and “fall back” clock changes linked to strokes, heart attacks and car accidents. But he wants to gather more information, one asks Long-term delayed federal analysis How time changes can affect other issues such as productivity, transportation and energy costs.
“In my opinion, there is no consensus in the congregation, or even at this point in general, on whether there should be a standard time against daylight saving,” Ballon said. “As soon as the Senate passed the bill, members came up to me and said, ‘Oh, don’t do that. I need fixed time, ‘he added, refusing to identify the lawmakers.
Aides to Congress said the White House had not announced its position on permanent daylight saving time. President Biden, a new senator who voted for it in December 1973 – the last time Congress tried to establish policy across the country – also saw an immediate drop in support amid widespread reports that dark winter mornings contribute to more cars. Accidents and bad mood. Before it was finally repealed in October 1974, members of Congress introduced nearly 100 laws to change or repeal the law.
The Office of White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D) declined to answer questions about the daylight saving time policy on Friday, citing reporters. Return to previous reports that the Senate action is being reviewed.
Senate Project Senate Patti Murray (D-Wash.), Chair of Health Panel and no. 3 Democrats and Sen. It has the support of both parties, led by Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). The two were guided by a process called unanimous approval of the bill that passed the chamber on Tuesday, which eliminates the need for debate or eliminates the actual vote count if any senator opposes an action.
Proponents of permanent daylight saving time argue that adding one hour of daylight during the day can increase business and lead to mental gains as people spend time shopping, eating and outdoors. Murray and Rubio point to states such as Washington and Florida that have sought permanent daylight saving time but are awaiting federal approval to do so. Their aides said they were working to stimulate support for change among their House colleagues – while pushing for a referendum as soon as possible while keeping pace around the idea.
“While it is detrimental to the health of Americans and our economy, year after year, retreats and retreats create unnecessary chaos,” Murray wrote in Pelosi. Letter sent on Friday His office shared with The Washington Post. “I hope once again that you will consider this General Knowledge Act immediately.”
Lawmakers who want to change national time policies are working against the clock, said Thomas Gray, a professor of political science at the University of Texas at Dallas.
“This is an unusual dynamic, and there’s only two weeks where people really care about it,” said Clock, which watches clocks moving one hour forward in the spring, and clocks retreat in the fall, Gray said. “It usually takes more than a week to do something in Congress. When people are interested in the process of passing a bill, it is difficult to fit that period.
Tuesday’s successful Senate vote came two days later – and many uncomfortable nights of sleep – after the Sunday morning clock change. But the next clock change is set for November 6 – in the middle of a house break, two days before lawmakers stop. For the election.
Geoffrey A. Snyder, professor of public policy at the University of Southern California, who studied the politics of daylight saving time with Gray, said the table “worries anyone who is in favor of going into permanent daylight saving time.” Jenkins said. “The problem is that the council is not ready for the city, the Democratic leadership is not ready for the city, and there are some outsiders who do not want to go into permanent daylight saving time.
That counter-lobby is already operational, and lawyers have warned they will change the clock this week. Winter can lead to sunrises In cities like Indianapolis and Detroit after 9 a.m., school children and many workers were forced to travel in the dark. Save Standard Time, a non-profit organization that calls for the adoption of permanently fixed time, has sent dozens of messages urging supporters to contact lawmakers to register their denial. Senate Bill.
Representative. Don Bayer’s (D-Va.) Office was overflowing with calls and letters, reflecting “almost split in support / opposition to the Senate bill,” spokesman Aaron Fritzner said. Wrote On Twitter.
Health experts have renewed their concerns about switching to permanent daylight saving time Disrupts circadian rhythms by forcing people into an unnatural sleep schedule.
“The Senate’s swift action today is not allowed for a strong debate or a debate,” the American Academy of Sleep Medicine said in a statement after Tuesday’s vote. “We believe that permanent permanent time is the best way to health.”
Some senators said they were surprised Voting on Tuesday They wanted them to realize it was happening. But leading supporters of the bill have repeatedly called for this policy Speeches on the Senate site Last year, Murray and Rubio’s staff said they had spent weeks targeting the March 12 clock change, finding time on the business, science and transport room calendar with the Senate committee as a great moment to put the movement forward.
Each Senate office was notified last week of the movement pending after the law was made a “hotline”. Rubio’s spokesman Dan Holler said the process by which lawmakers notify their colleagues of consensus requests. Since the vote, Their aides said neither Rubio nor Murray’s offices received complaints from other senators.
But House leaders were also surprised by the decision and said they were determined to take their time in reconsidering the bill, a senior House aide said. Anonymous position to discuss pending law.
“What is the old George Washington line? Now the House, as a highly debating body, will act as a tea saucer to cool the Senate’s overbearing sentiments,” the aide wrote in a text message, reversing a phrase often quoted as the nation’s first cause. President.
The White House is also reviewing the law, and two aides told The Post that the Domestic Policy Council and the National Economic Council are examining the implications. So far, management has refused to push for change.
“We are openly coordinating and working closely with Congress on all the laws they consider, but I do not have a specific position from the administration at this time,” spokeswoman Jen Zhaki told reporters Wednesday.
Congress first established daylight saving time in 1919 and then held several votes to extend or reduce it. Those efforts peaked in 1973, when lawmakers voted in favor of a two-year national test of permanent daylight saving time, led by President Richard M. Inspired by Nixon, he argued that it would save energy in the midst of the energy crisis triggered by the oil strike. United States through the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries or OPEC.
But amid reports that the dark morning could lead to traffic accidents, the plan, with little evidence, significantly reduced energy costs, and political figures began calling for its repeal within days of the law being passed.
In March 1974, the Senate action to overturn the change failed by 48-43 votes; Biden sat without voting. (The White House did not answer the question as to why Biden did not vote.)
Speed for cancellation built in spring, The energy crisis ended and continued throughout the summer.
“We’ve tested daylight saving time in a dark winter – one winter is enough,” former Senator Dick Clark called on the Iowa Democrats to cancel on August 15, 1974. “I hope the Senate will seize this opportunity.
The following week, the House voted 383-16 to abolish permanent daylight saving time, which the Senate agreed to in a September 1974 voice vote. President Gerald Ford Quickly signed the bill.
Ballon said the rapid decline of projects in the 1970s shows the dangers of rushing to adhere to permanent daylight saving time.
“What you and I are pointing out is that you’re not going to make everyone happy, are you?” He said in an interview. “That’s why I say, we have to spend some time trying to figure it out. Is there a consensus?”
As the debate intensified, Ballon said some lawmakers had come up with an idea in the spirit of the Washington compromise.
“Actually some people told me, ‘Why don’t you split the difference?… Make it half an hour,’ ‘he said.
Alice Critts contributed to this report.