Trump challenges riot lawsuits, saying fiery speech is an official act

The names of the company and law firm shown above are automatically generated based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and improve on the beta. We welcome your feedback using the Feedback tab on the right side of the page.

January 10 (Reuters) – Donald Trump’s lawyer argued in court on Monday that the former president could not be prosecuted for his eloquent speech before the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol because he was acting within the limits of his official presidential duties. .

Trump’s lawyer, behind Jesse, said during a court hearing that Trump was “immune” or shield from three cases of Democrats and two police officers.

“Executive immunity should be broad-based,” Binnal said.

Sign up now for unlimited free access to Reuters.com

Cases filed by plaintiffs, including Democrats U.S. Representatives Eric Schwell and Jerry Nadler, argue that Trump is responsible for injuries to police and lawmakers.

The Supreme Court case since 1982 is so big in this case that presidents are getting rid of lawsuits over their official actions.

During the five-hour court hearing, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in the District of Columbia pressed both sides’ attorneys on the limitations of this presidential exception.

Defendants’ attorney Joseph Sellers objected that Trump’s speech was a campaign event, not an official act, and that the Supreme Court’s intention to protect presidents from such conduct cases was “unthinkable”.

“There was no formal role in inciting a revolt targeting Congress,” the vendors said.

See also  Hawaii Rainbow Warriors football coach Todd Graham has resigned over allegations that he abused players.

Democrat lawmakers have enacted legislation enacted in 1871 to fight the white supremacist Gu Klux Klan, which prohibits political intimidation.

The lawsuits allege that the Capitol attack was a direct result of Trump’s actions, including the speech to thousands of supporters who besieged the building that sought to overthrow President Joe Biden’s election.

Mehta did not issue a verdict on Monday, saying during the trial the case raises difficult legal questions.

Supporters of former President Donald Trump touch the Washington Monument as the sun rises over the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2022, the first anniversary of the January 6, 2022 attack on the Capitol. REUTERS / Tom Brenner

“If there is anything in this investigation, it is not an easy case,” Mehta said.

At one point, Mehta questioned whether Trump’s comments after the Capitol siege were intended to incite riots.

“What can I do to ensure that the President does not immediately condemn this behavior?” Mehta said later.

“In a credible position, is it not sufficient to at least reliably speculate that the President agreed with the conduct of the people within the Capitol on that day?”

Pinnacle replied: “The President cannot be subjected to judicial action for any harm caused by failing to do anything.”

Trump was fired by the House of Representatives and acquitted by the Senate of inciting riots, which is also under investigation by the House Select Committee.

In Svalbard’s case, there are similar demands against Trump allies who spoke at the Jan. 6 rally, including campaign attorney Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s eldest son Donald Trump Jr. and Republican congressman Mo Brooks.

See also  January 6 Committee News - Latest: Trump Cancels Annual Speech as Sean Hannitty's Speeches Revealed

Brooks, who represented himself during the trial, asked Mehta to reject Swallowwell’s allegations against him.

Brooks argued at the January 6 rally that his comments were within the bounds of his duties as a member of the House. A law known as the Westfall Act protects federal employees from being prosecuted for actions taken as part of their work.

Trump and his co-defendants argued that their comments prior to the January 6 attacks were political speech protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Two Capitol police officers who prosecuted Trump were James Blassingham and Sidney Hempy.

Sign up now for unlimited free access to Reuters.com

Reported by John Wolf in Boston; Editing by Scott Malone, Alastair Bell and Howard Coller

Our standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *