Former President Donald Trump The House Select Committee sued the investigation January 6, 2021A filing in a federal court in Florida is a way to challenge its subpoena for documents and his testimony.
Trump is challenging both the panel’s legality — which several courts have upheld — and saying it should be freed from testimony about his time as president.
Trump’s lawyers say they have been in contact with the council over the past week and a half The subpoena deadline is approachingIt offers to consider responding to written questions while expressing “concerns and objections” about most of the document requests.
“The subpoena’s request for testimony and documents from President Trump is an unwarranted intrusion into the President’s institution because there are other sources of information requested, including more than a thousand witnesses contacted by the committee and a million documents collected by the committee,” his lawyers argue in the lawsuit. Records can also be obtained. Because it is expressly available to obtain testimony and documents from other readily available sources, the subpoena is void.”
Jan. 6 A spokesman for the group declined to comment.
Trump said the House’s demands, if met, would violate privilege protections surrounding the executive branch, including revealing conversations he had with Justice Department officials and members of Congress about the 2020 election and “pending government business.”
He also argued in court that he is not required to disclose the inner workings of the 2020 presidential campaign, “including his political beliefs, strategy and fundraising. President Trump did not check his constitutional rights at the Oval Office door. The committee’s subpoena to President Trump is invalid because it violates his First Amendment rights.
Trump’s lawyer, David Warrington, said in a statement that “long-standing precedent and practice precludes Congress from compelling a president to testify under the separation of powers.”
The case could stall the Trump subpoena fight for the House Select Committee.
The back-and-forth litigation with the Trump House will make it more difficult for the committee to enforce the subpoena — and the dispute could be intractable before the current Congress expires in January.
The case raises some protections around the presidency that have never been fully tested by appeals courts, and Trump brought the case to a court that, unlike D.C., has not weighed in on his position with House Democrats over the past several years.
Trump provided the court with the latest letters from his team, along with one that showed the House committee last week made zero attempts to obtain records of his electronic communications on personal phones, text messages or other applications since January 6, 2021. According to the letters, Trump also sought to identify every phone and other communication device Trump used from Election Day until he left the presidency.
In a letter dated Nov. 4, the original date of the document-turnover deadline, the House committee accused Trump’s team of trying to delay it.
“Given the timing and nature of your letter — without any acknowledgment that Mr. Trump will ultimately comply with the subpoena — your approach on his behalf appears to be a belated tactic,” wrote Rep. Penny Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi, who chairs the committee. .
Since Trump’s team responded on Nov. 9 that he would not testify, court documents said no records of private communications were available, leaving the House substantially unresponsive.
But Trump’s legal team responded to the House this week that Trump “voluntarily directed a reasonable search for documents in his possession” that fit both of those categories. His lawyers said the search turned up nothing.
This story has been updated with additional details.